PageOnePR
'; } ?> 
  • \"Services\""; } elseif (($page == "capabilities") || ($page == "best_practices")) { echo "\"Services\""; } else { echo "\"Services\""; } ?>
  • \"Clients\""; } elseif (($page == "current") || ($page == "past") || ($page == "testimonials") || ($page == "results") || ($page == "makingnews")) { echo "\"Clients\""; } else { echo "\"Clients\""; } ?>
  • \"Careers\""; } elseif (($page == "culture") || ($page == "benefits") || ($page == "watercooler")) { echo "\"Careers\""; } else { echo "\"Careers\""; } ?>
  • \"Contact\""; } else { echo "\"Contact\""; } ?>
  • \"Blog\""; } else { echo "\"Blog\""; } ?>
  • \"Japan\""; } else { echo "\"Japan\""; } ?>
  • Subscribe to this feed

    The Page Wonders

    Social media is changing PR in new and exciting ways. More than ever before, companies want help from a PR partner who can put smart, creative, independent-thinking professionals on tough problems using these new tools to seize opportunities and solve problems. Read here about some of the exploits of our Page Wonders and tell us what you think!

    Other Staff Blogs:Craig Oda | Shelly Milam


    The Next JBoss
    posted by Chantal Yang at

    One of the most common goals we hear from prospects is, "We want to be the next JBoss." The inevitable follow up question is, "How did you do it?"

    I like to say "with a lot of blood, toils, tears and sweat," but that would border on sentimentality. The truth is, JBoss in 2003 had a lot going for it already: good, free technology (or, in more famous words, "It's free and it doesn't suck"); a growing community; and a firebrand of a chief executive in Marc Fleury.

    What PR provided was discipline, consistency, and a soapbox. The rest was history.

    You could argue that open source developers were the original online social networkers. With that in mind, there were three things that JBoss did right that went against conventional PR wisdom at the time, but are more applicable than ever today, especially given the rise of social media usage.

    First, JBoss always put the community first. Under the open source mantra of "release early, release often," JBoss developers didn't wait for sign off from PR to release code, announce it on community mailing lists, and blog about it. This was initially a major headache for PR, as I often took calls from reporters asking me why I hadn't told them about such and such a release. And, as JBoss expanded the number of projects over which it had direct stewardship, this disconnect only exacerbated.

    The PR team initially tried to control this, but communities don't work this way. Traditional PR often focuses on controlling the flow of information when it should focus on the content itself, regardless of whether it is delivered through press releases, interviews, blog posts, podcasts, or presentations. Once we accepted that, we used the the blogs (remember, this was 2003!) as another way to get information out that supported messages of innovation, community, and participation.

    Second, JBoss did not fear controversy. We never attempted to "censor" Fleury; his strong opinions, enthusiasm, and colorful choice of words gave him an authentic voice that no amount of PR prepping/media training could ever create. But those strong opinions--not just from him but from other JBossians--sometimes rubbed others the wrong way, inviting controversy after controversy. While each episode was challenging to go through, JBoss always came out of it smarter than before.

    It's always a good idea to take the high road, but there are times when it really pays to be scrappy. If you're the David in a hot market with lots of Goliath players, you can't always turn the other cheek. Those willing to put up a good fight have a fighting chance.

    Lastly, JBoss was incredibly metrics-driven. The company bootstrapped itself for almost four years before taking on venture financing. PR, as Fleury liked to tell it, was JBoss' biggest investment. To track this investment, we established detailed reporting that looked at every article, every positive and negative word, and every key message we wanted to get across. This was done on a quarterly basis, and when things didn't track, we adjusted the program.

    Fast forward that five years to 2009 and you will see that metrics is more important than ever. We're in the midst of a recession, so measuring spending vs. results is essential. Though PR is still more art than science, there are sophisticated tools now to make reporting that much easier and that much more valuable to the company.

    If you're doing PR today, you know it's a changing business. JBoss' success was a product of its time, though it offers some lessons that stand true today. You have many more tools with which to build community around your offerings and measure adoption and visibility. You may not be the next JBoss; but you could very well create your own category and become the benchmark for startups to come.

    Labels: , , ,

    7 Comments:

    Blogger Koen Aers said...

    Maybe it's me but sometimes I wonder how it is possible to keep track of the real valuable information in this web 3.0 world. Don't you think that the overload of information makes people more indifferent and tends to make people overlook the good stuff that is coming out?

    March 31, 2009 at 7:31 AM  
    Anonymous Craig Oda said...

    I really like this post. It has an authentic voice. I especially like this:

    "It's always a good idea to take the high road, but there are times when it really pays to be scrappy. If you're the David in a hot market with lots of Goliath players, you can't always turn the other cheek. Those willing to put up a good fight have a fighting chance."

    The reason I like it so much that PR advice is often safe and generic. In 90% of the cases, it is better to take the high road. So, PR people often give this advice to the client. However, in the trade off of risk and reward, sometimes the risks pay off, sometimes they pay off big.

    It takes a special type of person to be able to continually fight over controversial ideas. Most people would get psychologically exhausted by the constant battle. However, there are times when it really works.

    March 31, 2009 at 5:16 PM  
    Blogger Chantal Yang said...

    Koen, I don't know if I'm ready to call it "Web 3.0" yet, but I believe people would much rather have more information that they can sort through than less. Fortunately, to manage this excess, we have many tools that help us get only what we want. Even in these, you can see an evolution from opt-in email newsletters to RSS feeds to Digg to Twitter. Tomorrow, something else (http://gigaom.com/2009/03/31/why-bitly-could-upstage-digg/)?

    April 1, 2009 at 9:26 AM  
    Blogger Chantal Yang said...

    Craig, thanks for your comment. I think taking the high road works for most people because it's easier to be liked. To fight back, to stand your ground takes a great amount of moxie and thick skin.

    April 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM  
    Blogger Craig Oda said...

    Good point about moxie and thick skin. It takes both a special person and a willingness take risks to fail and succeed in public.

    April 1, 2009 at 9:40 AM  
    Blogger Unknown said...

    I always wondered how you were crazy enough to put up with us. I still wonder whether the same strategy esp the blog part still works. When I installed the blog software everyone insisted it was a waste of time...before long everyone was doing it and Marc said "BLOGGING MANDATORY" :-). To me a key piece of effectiveness was keeping the blog central, but after the merger it quickly broke up. I guess controversy is harder to get past HR at a C corp. Glad we had the support of a PR firm with a SPINE.

    April 4, 2009 at 9:14 AM  
    Blogger Chantal Yang said...

    Andy, thanks for your comment. Great to hear from you. Blogs seem to have become mandatory now, so you guys were years ahead. They still provide a versatile and informal way to elucidate the different sides of a story that do not necessarily make it to more mainstream channels. Moreover, with a changing media landscape, PR can't rely on traditional media to produce content alone. We have to produce content, too, and push it out through other channels.

    April 14, 2009 at 5:54 PM  

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

    << Home